Time for the March of the Criminals and Commies again, since it is May 1. And of course it is pure coincidence that the Caravan of Wannabe Invaders came all the way to the California portion of the border and arrived at this time. Riiiiiiight. What a bunch of stupid theatrics.
Someone forgot they were supposed to be in the shadows!
Speaking of stupid cultural appropriation of kabuki theater, Larry Lopez, appearing under his stage name Nativo, is still doing a very poor imitation of Jesse Jackson. Or maybe Gloria Alred? Whichever. Larry, whose attempt to beat a criminal prosecution had him either feigning dementia eight years ago, or making a miraculous recovery since, or perhaps is still demented (I'll let you decide), made it into the Orange County Register and either the reporter was too lazy or agenda-driven to note the paper's previous coverage of Larry, or the editors decided to cover for him. It even appears to me that they have prevented comments from being made on the article.
If you're not interested, at least scroll down for a reminder that rioting has lasting negative consequences.
Showing posts with label commies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label commies. Show all posts
Tuesday, May 1, 2018
Monday, May 1, 2017
March of the Communists and Criminals
May 1 comes around every year, of course. Communists march as though communism hasn't killed 100,000,000 people. Criminals march and demonstate and riot while simultaneously claiming to be living in the shadows. Those who want a communist country should move to Cuba. Our immigration policy should benefit us before the illegal alien.
Previously:
Don't Base Laws For All on Rare Hard Cases
They're Making Our Point For Us
Truly Comprehensive Immigraion Reform
Previously:
Don't Base Laws For All on Rare Hard Cases
They're Making Our Point For Us
Truly Comprehensive Immigraion Reform
Labels:
border control,
commies,
coveting or envying,
crime,
Democrats,
illegal aliens,
immigration
Tuesday, December 29, 2015
What Are You Going to Do For Me, Bernie?
My dad came from very modest means. His father told him he was spending too much time on his studies and not enough helping with work, which mean working with his hands. My father was the first in his family to go to college, because some of his teachers strongly encouraged him to fill out scholarship paperwork. He graduated from a university and moved for work.
My mother came from a middle-class family. She went to a university, graduated, and went to work.
My parents met working (someone people should never do now thanks to sexual harassment issues). They dated and, before very long, they married - they didn't shack up for years and pop out children outside of wedlock. My mother had avoided getting pregnant before she married. My father had avoided impregnating before he married. But they wanted children and my mother was not going to abandon her children to daycare.
My father decided he needed to earn more money if he was going to support a wife and children, and that meant getting more education. He worked during the day and went to school at night. He completed his studies and changed careers, and subsequently worked his ass off, keeping his nose clean in the process as he climbed a career ladder. My parents started to have children and bought house that was a good place to raise a family, and they added on to the house as needed as the family grew.
We didn’t live a flashy life. My parents did not spend money frivolously. They emphasized good character and effective studying. We went to public schools. They avoided turning us in to entitled narcissists. We never were encouraged to have anger towards anyone who had more wealth than our family nor seek anything from the government.
I studied hard. I kept my nose clean. I avoided substance abuse and fornicating and putting myself at risk of deadly diseases or knocking a girl up. I was active in a sport, had hobbies, and got a job while still in high school.
Then I went to an affordable university. I never once walked out of class in protest, vandalized or trespassed or assaulted anyone while there, never shouted down any speakers, and I kept working at my job through my full-time studies. I graduated and immediately began working at my job full-time, but also took on some side jobs. After a few years of pounding the pavement, (because I knew I needed to make more money), I was hired in a career-potential job. I also kept my old job, working it part time, and still took on some side jobs. I was working my ass off. I was bringing in much more income than my living expenses, because I lived modestly, drove a used car, practiced good financial habits, avoided crime and substance abuse, and avoiding getting any women knocked up.
I invested my money.
Largely paying for the festivities myself, I married a woman with shared values and goals who’d also been financially responsible, avoided crime and substance abuse, and was never knocked up. Despite significant challenges, she’d graduated from a university in four years and had gone to work full-time in skilled profession. Like me, she had avoided shacking up with anyone.
I dropped the part-time job and my wife reduced her work hours so we could actually BE married rather than living like mere roommates.
We lived modestly.
When we went ahead with our plans to start a family, as she had insisted and I agreed, she quit her job. We “splurged” on a new minivan by paying cash for it and selling off another vehicle. When market conditions were in our favor, we bought a house so our family would have a stable and otherwise suitable place to grow.
We continue to live modestly. Because we save and invest for our future, there are a many things we want to do NOW that we can’t. Our investments are entirely voluntary. We CHOOSE to invest in certain businesses. The people who work for those businesses ASKED for their jobs, and agreed to take them at the compensation that was offered. The people who buy the products and services of those businesses do so voluntarily. The only exception is when Big Government gets involved.
Now Senator Bernie Sanders, and other people who talk like him, want to punish me and my family. If not directly, they will punish me by attacking, plundering, and restricting the companies in which I invest, to buy votes from a lot of people who have lived beyond their means, who went to schools they couldn’t afford and, often, misbehaved while there, who have frittered away their money and health on substance abuse, who have stolen and assaulted, who’ve been popping out kids out of wedlock.
Why do you want to punish me, Bernie?
What are you going to do for ME Bernie?
Actually, you know what? I don’t want a President who does things for me, other than doing things for the Union of which I’m a citizen. I want a President who seeks to protect the Union from foreign enemies, who’ll prosecute interstate crime, who will veto legislation that does more harm than good, and who will make appointments/nominations of individuals who truly respect the Constitution. I don’t want a President to be my Daddy or Gandaddy or to promise me goodies.
The best thing a candidate for POTUS can say in response to “What are you going to do for me?” is “The same thing I’m going to do for everyone else; try to protect you from foreign enemies and limit government."
The President is not there to solve every problem. The federal government shouldn't even try to solves every problem. Some problems can't be solved. Some things some people call problems aren't problems at all, or are problems of their own making.
Stop looking for a politicians to clean up messes you've made. Stop trying to hire someone to be your bully to take from those who have produced. Make something of yourself.
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
Who Cares About the Younger Generations?
Candidate for the GOP nomination for President Mitt Romney is making an excellent point.
This clip is a good one:
The video ends too soon, however. As reported by McClatchy, Romney goes on to question why young voters would vote Democrat:
Every service, every thing that is designed, engineered, sculpted, cooked, mixed, fixed, built, manufactured, recorded, transported, or installed is the result of someone working. It takes work to provide goods and services. One person may choose to provide another with something for free, but what the person doing the questioning was asking for was for someone else to be forced to provide something to her for "free". Only, it won't be free. Someone has to pay for it, because it isn't growing naturally in large quantities on free land all around us. Given how far in debt we are as a country, it is the younger generations and generations yet unborn who would be doing the payment.
Romney's official take on this can be found here.
Some young people want to believe that they can have everything they want without working for it - that they can get a higher education and respected degree, a nice house, contraception, and anything else they want without working hard for it. That's not living in reality, and the younger generations of voters need to think about the size and intrusion of government, the national debt, and where these things are going to be when they are seasoned citizens. What kind of nation will their children and grandchildren be left with?
If you want "free stuff", vote for Obama and the other Democrats on the ticket, but realize that the free stuff isn't really free.
This clip is a good one:
The video ends too soon, however. As reported by McClatchy, Romney goes on to question why young voters would vote Democrat:
"And I say that for this reason: That party is focused on providing more and more benefits to my generation. And (amassing) trillion dollar annual deficits my generation wil never pay for.Just see Paul Ryan's latest budget proposals and see the reactions.
"The interest on that debt," he said, "is going to young people in America....it's going on piece by piece. My party is consumed with the idea of getting federal spending down and creating economic growth and opportunity so we can balance our budget and stop putting these debts on you."
"Those debts are not frightening to people my age," he said. "Because we'll be gone."Just look at what has been happening in Greece.
Every service, every thing that is designed, engineered, sculpted, cooked, mixed, fixed, built, manufactured, recorded, transported, or installed is the result of someone working. It takes work to provide goods and services. One person may choose to provide another with something for free, but what the person doing the questioning was asking for was for someone else to be forced to provide something to her for "free". Only, it won't be free. Someone has to pay for it, because it isn't growing naturally in large quantities on free land all around us. Given how far in debt we are as a country, it is the younger generations and generations yet unborn who would be doing the payment.
Romney's official take on this can be found here.
Some young people want to believe that they can have everything they want without working for it - that they can get a higher education and respected degree, a nice house, contraception, and anything else they want without working hard for it. That's not living in reality, and the younger generations of voters need to think about the size and intrusion of government, the national debt, and where these things are going to be when they are seasoned citizens. What kind of nation will their children and grandchildren be left with?
If you want "free stuff", vote for Obama and the other Democrats on the ticket, but realize that the free stuff isn't really free.
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Charity is Saintly
I would never call anyone a Communist for asking why the poor have no food.
Interetingly enough, though, many people have starved because of Communism.
The poor in this union do not lack food. It's more likely that most of the poor in our fifty (fifty-seven?) states are overweight.
Giving your own food to those who need it is saintly behavior. Collecting donations of food and giving it to those who need it saintly behavior.Interetingly enough, though, many people have starved because of Communism.
The poor in this union do not lack food. It's more likely that most of the poor in our fifty (fifty-seven?) states are overweight.
Taking food by force from one person and giving it to another is immoral, and is just one thing that happens under forced Communism.
It is dismaying that so many on the Left do not see a dffirence between voluntary interactions and forced interactions. No wonder some Leftists think all sex is rape.
Labels:
commies,
The Left,
Tired Leftist Imagery
Friday, December 2, 2011
Adam Carolla Tells It Like It Is Re: Occupy
Labels:
commies,
coveting or envying,
talk radio,
taxes,
The Left
Monday, May 2, 2011
Fewer Criminals Willing to March
The annual March of the Criminals is getting smaller. Sam Quinones of the Los Angeles Times reports.
So much for hiding in the shadows. The paper can’t bring itself to use the correct phrase, illegal alien.
Heh heh.
Yay! Enforce existing laws.
Pathetic.
Many of the protesters are angry at Obama for not granting them all citizenship and paying their way through college. Ingrates. They should be marching to denounce the corruption in their home countries, and express appreciation to Americans for letting them hang out there and use our infrastructure and public services.
Few people felt the low turnout at this year's May Day march as acutely as Salvador Ramirez.
Ramirez, an illegal immigrant from Jalisco, Mexico, pushed a cart among the few thousand immigrant-rights and labor activists Sunday on Broadway, selling American flags.
So much for hiding in the shadows. The paper can’t bring itself to use the correct phrase, illegal alien.
Only a few thousand people showed up for the nine-block march that started early and ended quickly. Los Angeles police declined to issue a crowd estimate, but marchers didn't even fill the intersection of Broadway and 1st Street, where the demonstration ended.
Heh heh.
But six years with no significant legislative reform "has started to chip away at the spirit of the community," said Pedro Reyes, a former L.A. resident who recently moved to Santa Maria, Calif., where he teaches English to migrant farm workers. "It's definitely causing a toll."
Yay! Enforce existing laws.
This year handmade posters were largely replaced with pre-printed signs and T-shirts. And instead of young couples pushing strollers, most marchers were union members - particularly from the Service Employees International Union, which turned out hundreds of people - or members of a socialist or communist group.
Pathetic.
Many of the protesters are angry at Obama for not granting them all citizenship and paying their way through college. Ingrates. They should be marching to denounce the corruption in their home countries, and express appreciation to Americans for letting them hang out there and use our infrastructure and public services.
Labels:
Big Labor,
commies,
illegal aliens,
The Left
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
